|
Mental Health Professionals in the Family Court: Custody Proceedings and Child Welfare
Mental health professionals play a central role in a variety of functions related to civil law (Hennessy, 1989). There are three types of intervention performed with psychologists and psychiatrists: crisis intervention, evaluation, and referral for treatment (Hennessy).
Crisis intervention involves getting a mental health ‘snapshot’ when a motion for temporary orders/emergency guardianship goes before court.
Referrals for treatment to local facilities are made as the court cannot be a treatment centre. Liaison is maintained on behalf of the court.
Evaluation is the most common intervention sought by courts from psychologists, involving assisting the courts in determining suitability for custody/visitation and claims of mental capacity and abuse.
There are three types of cases (Hennessy, 1989): domestic relations, child welfare and mental health matters. The first two types most often involve custody or visitation. While not strictly a family court matter, medical treatment and antipsychotic drug cases involve use of mental health professionals as a finding of incompetence is the threshold issue before any other determination can be made.
As previously mentioned, psychologists are called on occasion by courts to assess families to determine custody, placing a serious responsibility on court-appointed psychologists to make recommendations about a child’s welfare (Siegal, 1991). It is often criticized that clear guidelines for methods of compiling family reports are left up to the counselor’s discretion and that the opinions of health professionals on custody disputes are lacking in scientific validity. Often, when assessing families, too much emphasis in placed on the lifestyles of the parents at the expense of what the child wants.
As mentioned in Hennessy (1989), custody decisions require careful assessment of each parent and their relationship with the child.
Additional factors to take into account in a custody proceeding can include (according to Siegel, 1991): the wishes of the child; the wishes of the parents; the interaction and relationship between the child and parents, siblings, and other significant members; the child’s adjustment to their home, school and community; the mental health of all involved; the attitude to the child and responsibilities/duties of parenthood by the parents; and the capacity of the parent to provide for the child’s needs.
Taken From:
Hennessey, E.F. (1989). The family, the courts, and mental health professionals, American Psychologist, 44, 1223-1224.
Siegal, M. (1991). Concern for the conversational environment: Questioning children in custody disputes, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 473-478.
|
| |
Ackerman-Schoendorf Scales for Parent Evaluation of Custody (ASPECT)
This is a clinical tool that will help you make more objective child custody recommendations. Easy to use and interpret, ASPECT offers a practical, standardized, and defensible approach to child custody evaluations. Research has shown 90% agreement between ASPECT recommendations and custody decisions made by judges, in cases where there was a significant difference between the ASPECT scores of the mother and the father. In addition, ASPECT has differentiated situations in which one parent should obtain full custody from those in which joint custody is appropriate. And it has proven effective in identifying parents who need supervision during child visitation.
Click for more information
Parent-Child Relationship Inventory (PCRI)
This unique self-report inventory tells you how parents view the task of parenting and how they feel about their children. Standardized on more than 1,100 parents across the United States, the PCRI includes 78 items covering seven distinct scales: Parental Support, Satisfaction With Parenting, Involvement, Communication, Limit Setting, Autonomy and Role Orientation.
Click for more information
Parent Report Card for Children
Here’s a unique way to open up family communication. The Parent Report Card lets kids grade their parents—on everything from keeping secrets to helping with homework. Available in child and teen versions, the Parent Report Card gives youngsters a structured and acceptable way to express their feelings.
Click for more information
Family Assessment Measure - III (FAM-III)
The FAM–III assessment is unique in its ability to provide a multilevel (within-family) assessment of family functioning across six universal clinical parameters and two validity scales. It consists of three forms: the General Scale examines overall family health; the Dyadic Relationship Scale examines how a family member views his or her relationship with another family member; and the Self-Rating Scale allows each person to rate his or her own functioning within the family. By comparing the three scales to each other, you obtain a rich picture of how family members view levels of family interaction.
Click for more information
For more information on these tools please refer to our website at www.psychpress.com.au, or contact one of our consultants on 1300 308 076 or 03 9670 0590 or email us at info@psychpress.com.au
|